Peter Jackson » The Jay

Home | About The Jay | Links | Contact     

Peter Jackson


Lindsay Lohan wastedToday, I, and the rest of the world, or at least the Hollywood tabloidista, will honor the birth of one of the entertainment industry’s biggest and best coked out, rehab-shucking, talent-eroding, knife-wielding, weight dropping, boytoy banging, crazy as hell Celebritards since the Olsen twins turned eighteen. Yes, that’s right, batten down the hatches, order extra cases of Red Bull and Grey Goose, stay off the streets and hide your children, Lindsay Lohan turns 21 today. And we here at TheJay.com would like to celebrate this momentous occasion by bestowing 21 birthday wishes on our favorite former hottie who inexplicably dropped twenty pounds, took out her implants, died her hair blonde, started doing mass amounts of blow, showed up in a string of shitty movies, alienated the Disney crowd, put her imlants back in, when to rehab, crashed her car, went back into rehab, became tabloid fodder to the point where the paparazzi are bored of her and pretty much ruined any chance of becoming an all-time masturbatory redhead fantasy we all thought she would be, but instead ended up being considered sleazier than Paris Hilton (and Paris Hilton is a fucking convict!).

So on Lindsay Lohan’s (hopefully dry) 21st birthday, TheJay.com wishes…

  1. That she switch from blow and vodka to wine. When you drink too much wine they call you sophisticated. When you drink too much hard liquor they call you Tara Reid. That’s a big difference.

  2. That she (and let it be known, I’m aware how stupid this sounds) take a cue from Paris Hilton and realize playing dumb isn’t cute anymore. Fact is it was never cute on Lindsay. Or on Paris, not that it matters. The only person that can convincingly pull of “dumb as cute” is Kelly Bundy and she’s fictional. Lindsay Lohan

  3. That she agrees to become Jane Fonda’s padwan learner. Sure, the partnership may lead to Lindsay going to Iraq and shilling for Arabs (Fallujah Lohan?), but at least we’ll eventually get a Lindsay Lohan aerobics video out of the deal, which would be totally worth it. There’s comedy, there’s high comedy, and then there’s Lindsay Lohan in a leotard teaching overweight Heartland wives how to jazzercise. Plus, you know, she might also become a well-respected two-time Oscar winner. Which would be nice for her.

  4. That someone reminds her Oscars are not won in a club, they’re won on a film set. And we’re not talking about the set of Just My Luck.

  5. That she take it from Sean Combs and never let anyone call her La Lohan ever again. It didn’t work for Puff Daddy, it’s not gonna work for Linds. Don’t make Diddy shut down the studio!

  6. That a slew of really hot boys tell her over and over again that pale chicks are cool. Nobody likes a blotchy fake tan. And pale became her quite well.

  7. That she’d go back to red and stay that way. If it’s good enough for the Pretty Woman, it’s good enough for the Mean Girl.

  8. That screen dad Dennis Quaid knocks some sense into her, In Good Company-style. He’s been through drugs, rehab and failed public relationships and he’s as popular now as he was twenty years ago. So take it from The Quaid, Lindsay, he is all-knowing; like that mutant tumor in Total Recall that wanted Arnold to “open [his] mind”. Lindsay Lohan

  9. That she at least consider, CONSIDER, marrying a suspicious A-list star who will turn her into a barely believable beard for a decade then release her from her blood oath (read: legally binding contract) so that she can turn into botoxed ice queen who marries a drug addicted musician but is still awesome because she makes crazy kick ass musicals with Renton from Trainspotting and horror flicks where they’re really the ghosts! And hey, I hear Hugh Jackman might be in the market.

  10. That she recognizes the fact that no actress who has ever won an Academy Award has ever shown her snatch in public. Other than Helen Mirren, of course. Septuagenarian snizz is the new black.

  11. That she take a note from Macaulay Culkin and divorce the hell out her no-good parents (and maybe even consider going on a North-style cross-country search for new ones. I know Brangelina are always on the look out for disadvantaged orphans.).

  12. That she try to convince Rachel McAdams to do a Freaky Friday-style career switch, only when it works, she refuses to switch back. This works in everyone’s favor because who isn’t curious what a skanky Rachel McAdams would look like?

  13. That Jodie Foster would slap her upside the head. Maybe some of her awesomeness would transfer to Lindsay through osmosis. Plus, there’s a small chance some of Jodie’s closet lesbianism would transfer as well. Holding knives to Vanessa Minnillo’s throat is one thing, but holding knives to her throat while sticking her tongue down the veejay’s throat is a whole other mind-blowing ballgame. Also, it might mean that Gina Gershon would be her friend, and that’s as fantastic a friendship for her as I can possibly imagine. Lindsay Lohan

  14. That someone sit her down and makes her watch Clueless again, a reminder that even beloved teen stars who don’t do crazy amounts of blow, bang skeezy C-list boytoys and put knives to boy bander girlfriends can end up without a career. Sure they may get to make an ill-advised romcom with a young Benicio Del Toro first, but eventually (read: 2-3 years) everyone will forget how insanely hot they were bungee-jumping off a bridge in LA and flipping off a cheating Stephen Dorff, and only remember the ten pounds they put on right before Crisco-ing themselves into a be-nippled rubber bat suit and “flirting” with the star of Vertical Limit. The audience goodwill only lasts for so long, is what I’m saying. And Mean Girls is now more than three years old.

  15. That she consider going the Heather Graham route and start exclusively doing mediocre comedies (with the occasional erotic titty thriller starring the lesser Fiennes sibling, thrown in). At least Rollergirl has her dignity.

  16. That she behead Hayden Panetierre, lest the Heroes-star take over Lindsay’s “hot young starlet with enormous talent potential and even more enormous Celebritard potential” turf. After all, as it goes in their world, there can be only one.

  17. That she start sending Steven Spielberg a fruit basket every day until he takes her call, Ma-Sheen in Wall Street-style. And on that note…

  18. That she dress up as a Japanese anime school girl and sleep with Quentin Tarantino. Or make Spike Jonze a mixtape. Or learn Spanish to impress Alfonso Cuaron. Or bring Peter Jackson a sandwich. Basically, that she do ANYTHING at all possible to improve the level of directors she’s been working with. I think being told how to emote by Emilio Estevez might have done the trick, but who knows?

  19. That Ben Affleck teaches her to embrace the irony of their tenuous celebrity and regain the public love by being in on the joke. And he knows of what he speaks. After all, Affleck was the bomb in Phantoms, yo! Lindsay Lohan is The Icecrotch!

  20. That she resurrect The Icecrotch, if only so that she can do epic, mythical battle with Dakota Fanning in an upcoming chapter of “The Stirring Tales of Master Assassin Dakota Fanning” (coming soon on TheJay.com)!

  21. That she knows if all else fails, showing your tits never hurt. Just ask Halle Berry. Early career love, mid-career stall, spectacularly bad celebrity divorce, hit a guy with her car, was virtually unhireable, showed her tits, won on Oscar, became a top shelf Bond girl, now beloved by Oprah. Doesn’t that seem like the exact career track of Lindsay Lohan? I can’t wait to see her in ten years walking be-thonged onto a Caribbean beach in “The Spy Who Loved Firecrotch” while a lecherous Daniel Craig flexes his pecs and feigns interest.

Happy Birthday, Lindsay! Try to stay out of trouble.

Bangarang!

CLICK HERE to subscribe to TheJay.com RSS Feed

NowLive.com, the home of Social Broadcasting

Peter JacksonIt was reported last week that famed hobbit documentary filmmaker and giant CGI ape enthusiast, Peter Jackson, had officially begun a studio dating game for his latest production, the adaptation of Alice Sebold’s best-selling (and utterly fantastic) drama The Lovely Bones. Now, ordinarily this bit of news would go unnoticed by me. All it really is is a director making a new movie. It’s not relevant that Jackson hasn’t made a straight-up drama in more than a decade, or that he’s coming off a particularly divisive remake of King Kong. And it’s even less relevant that while I can appreciate the merits and technical achievements of the Lord of the Rings trilogy and the peculiar, dark humor of The Frighteners, I’ve never actually been a fan of his work or style of filmmaking. It’s not even troubling to me that a director I don’t care for is attempting to slag off his fan base in order to indie it up on a property I find to be of unending quality and lyrical mastery.

What is troubling (and quite significant) to me is the reported budget he is looking for.

Peter Jackson is asking for a whopping $65 million dollars to make what is essentially a small, weepy family drama with very slight fantastical elements. For all that don’t know, The Lovely Bones is a book about a murdered 14 year-old girl who recalls what happened to her while in heaven, as she watches the effects of her death on her family. Aside from having to visualize heaven (think white clouds), the movie is a four-wall set and some heavy dialogue. At no point should this film cost more than $30 million, and that’s counting Jackson’s A-list salary.

The question here is, what’s all the money being used for?

The Lovely BonesIt’s no surprise to me that studios were hesitant to buy the rights to the project. Though Jackson is a mega-successful commercial director, he has never proven to be a viable entity in and of himself. He received widespread critical acclaim for his little girls lost drama Heavenly Creatures (which launched Kate Winslet), but just as soon as we started plotting him in for a yearly Oscar nod, he parlayed his newfound fame to bask in the bloody dead genre that started his career. The Frighteners was an anemic, disappointing follow-up, and after that he moved to the LotR trilogy. He never capitalized on his talents as a dramatic filmmaker. Sure, he can make an epic battle scene better than just about anyone not named Spielberg, Cameron or William Wallace, but can he deliver the goods with two people in a room sharing their feelings? Will his hugenormous geek audience come to see a Peter Jackson movie that doesn’t include orcs, apes or Elijah Wood? I have my doubts, and so does the rest of Hollywood.

This is all before we get into the budget concerns. Unless the film is stocked with marquee, A-list stars (such as The Departed), or has an unusually expensive quirk (say having to keep a legal action fund in case Russell Crowe got frustrated on the set of A Beautiful Mind), no small-minded drama should dare ring up a budget that high. This is the case for two reasons.

  1. Dramas have a limited audience, as teens won’t want to see the movie, and the genre isn’t known for repeat business.
  2. The success of the film is wholly dependent on intangibles. Whether the subject matter is relevant in today’s society, whether the marketing clearly sells the project (and to the right people), whether critics champion the film as a must see, the release date (a problem for even BIG dramas like Cinderella Man), the state of the marketplace, love for the cast, etc. While you can always bank on sci-fi movies having a built-in cache, dramas can never be relied upon to bring in a prepped and loyal audience.

Jackson must be banking on his name recognition to float the greenlight, and since DreamWorks did pick it up I suppose he had a point, but that still does not answer the question of why he needs $65 million to make this movie. Or why the studio thinks it can realistically recoup that cost. Here is a small list of high-profile dramas released in the last few years with their domestic box-office grosses, and their budgets in parenthesis.

  • Babel: $34 Million ($22 Million)
  • Capote: $28 Million ($7 Million)
  • Cinderella Man: $61 Million ($88 Million)
  • City By The Sea: $22 Million ($40 Million)
  • Crash: $54 Million ($6.5 Million)
  • The Constant Gardener: $33 million ($25 Million)
  • A History of Violence: $31 Million ($32 Million)
  • Million Dollar Baby: $100 Million ($30 Million)
  • The Weather Man: $12 Million ($22 Million)

Peter JacksonOnly one of those films earned more than $65 million and that was due to an awards season push (as well as collective audience love for Clint Eastwood). Each of those high-profile dramas were toplined a legitimate movie star and each of them (save Baby) was merely a modest hit. Now note the production budgets. All of them save Cinderella Man were below $40 million. And the only reason Cinderella Man was that high was the salaries for Russell Crowe, Renee Zellweger, Ron Howard and Brian Grazer. The budgets of these films were kept low because producers knew that the box office potential was dicey, and because they were not that expensive to make.

So again I raise the point, why does Peter Jackson need $65 Million dollars to make The Lovely Bones?

New York Magazine reports that the astronomical figure does NOT even cover his presumably substantial fee for writing and directing the movie. So let’s crunch some numbers. Let’s assume that he’s asking for $20 Million dollars to write and direct the film (making the “real” cost of the film $85 Million). This hubris essentially caps the potential for casting a group of high profile actors, let alone one stand out star. But for the sake of the argument, let’s call his fee $20 million dollars. Now we can assume that a film of this magnitude would keep an additional $10-15 Million for the rest of the cast. So now we’re at $35 Million. The average budget for the films listed above, after salaries, is about $25 Million, putting us at $60 Million already (and these numbers don’t even include marketing and distribution costs)! Even if we assume that Alice Sebold is asking for $5 Million for the rights, where is the additional $20 Million going? Is it that expensive to create a “realistic” depiction of heaven? Is Jackson planning on building a full-scale replica? Babel was filmed in more than 20 different countries, had more than 60 speaking parts and starred two huge actors and that only cost $7 Million TOTAL! I feel like I’m taking crazy pills here!

There has to be a reason he’s asking for so much money. There’s got to be something he needs the money for, beyond the cost of film, set design and salary. And since he won’t own up to his ridiculous demands, I’m left to muse on the possibilities. Here’s is what I think the mysterious extra $20 Million is being used for:

  • $3 Million for his new experimental Middle Earth-breeding zoo (containing big ass spiders, orcs, bland elves and Walloping Wallobees!). He has Sean Astin down in New Zealand donating DNA as we speak.
  • $3 Million for a letter writing campaign to all the disappointed movie-goers that lost 30% feeling in their asses during the interminable third act of King Kong (did we really need the ice-skating scene? Really?).
  • $4 Million for hush money to Elijah Wood, owing to an agreement that made one night on the set of The Two Towers when PJ got a little handsy with Elijah’s personal hobbit.
  • $2 Million to have fat pushed back into his body so that he can return to the roly-poly form that made him so fun and creative back before King Kong ate his soul.
  • $3 Million to cast Orlando Bloom as a grieving uncle and then CGI some charisma into his performance. WETA technicians are locked in a room as we speak trying to figure out how to do this. The outlook is grim.
  • $1 Million for legal representation to get a restraining order against Jack Black and the portly comic’s attempts at once again “rocking the drama salami peppercorn style, man!”
  • $2 Million for effects work on an inevitable deleted scene that has Susie, the murdered star of the movie, randomly falling love with a large ape that has a predilection for triple toe loops and double axels.
  • $2 Million personally handed to him by the makers of Eragon as an apology for lifting whole passages of the movie from Lord of the Rings.

Let’s use Million Dollar Baby as a cost comparison. Both films are directed by beloved, successful icons. Both are adaptations of well-regarded literary properties. Assuming Jackson acquires a like-minded cast, both films will be stocked with a bevy of heavy-hitting actors. And this one’s the key: both films are about small, interpersonal relationships.

NOW…

Peter JacksonClint Eastwood commands a large fee for his services. By all estimates he makes as much as Peter Jackson. Clint was coming off of Mystic River, a commercial and critical hit. He was starring in the movie with Morgan Freeman, himself quite a box office draw. By all rights, Million Dollar Baby (or even Mystic River) is the exact model that The Lovely Bones should be following. So home come Million Dollar Baby cost half as much? How come Mystic River cost less than 40% of The Lovely Bones? Why are Clint’s movies less expensive than Peter Jackson’s?

I’ll give you one more example for comparison’s sake, just to hammer my point home. 300, which was done completely in a digital environment and made with nearly as many effects shots as an average Star Wars movie, cost only $65 million to make. So unless The Lovely Bones is being re-envisioned as a large-scale digital war movie, replete with eight-pack abs and crazy big warrior elephants, someone made a mistake in the accounting.

Obviously, there is money being spent on The Lovely Bones that no one wants to talk about. Movies cost a lot of money, that’s just the way of the world. And some movies cost more money than they should, for a variety of reasons. Some directors prefer smaller budgets, as it helps them to retain creative control. Others just see no point in excess. Or they just work better under tighter, more demanding circumstances. And some just plain don’t know how to handle money. But this is the first time I’ve ever looked at the production budget for a movie and openly questioned it.

While there are probably solid reasons for spending so much money. I’d rather see Jackson spend less money and try to use that handicap to push his creativity. If he’s really taking a pause from making big-budget sci-fi epics, he needs to embrace the sensibilities of art-house filmmaking. And though he doesn’t get to film a heaven strewn with mythical creatures fighting to the death, he does get to make a wonderfully insightful drama about a family trying to cope with the loss of a loved one. And maybe, just maybe, he gets to be put back on the short list for Oscar.

Here’s hoping he comes to his senses, fires his accountant, and keeps the film under three hours. My ass can’t take anymore of his filmic abuse.

Bangarang!

CLICK HERE to subscribe to TheJay.com RSS Feed

NowLive.com